Know what your breweries are pouring next — Hop Grail's register of US beer label approvals.
Focus on the Fruit
- 10.5% ABV
- Cans
- fruited
- hazy
Tree House Brewing Company's Double / Imperial IPA. Label approved 8 June 2026.
More from Tree House Brewing Company
All 86 →
- Label submitted8 June 2026
- Label approved8 June 2026
- SpottedNo sighting on file
Ask Hop Grail:
Everything from Tree House Brewing Company is on their page.
Scan a can to find any beer like this one. Get the free iPhone app →
New beers from the week, every Friday.
This is the 22nd of 86 labels we have from Tree House Brewing Company. It is one of 210 double / imperial ipa labels approved in June 2026. It was submitted and approved the same day. The label carries fruited, hazy on the front.
Where this comes from
Read from the label art by Hop Grail. Fields checked against the approved label. How we get this data
A radial burst of warm colour dominates the full front, with concentric waves of yellow, orange, and red suggesting heat or light emanating from the centre. The beer name
From the label“Focus on the Fruit is a massive, indulgent Quadruple IPA conditioned on peach and guava purée! With double-digit pounds per barrel of dry hops and sticky-sweet fruit juice, it is anything but subtle. The hop profile is incredibly potent, with intense aromas of mango nectar, ripe citrus, and passion fruit candy. Within this tropical character are pronounced notes of peach smoothies and creamy guava popsicles. Each sip reveals layers of flavor that unfold over a smooth, velvety texture, making it a pleasure to drink despite its heft. Focus on the Fruit delivers a powerful yet balanced drinking experience, a hallmark of Tree House beer. It is a beer for those who love pushing the boundaries of what a juicy IPA can be. Enjoy!”
The brewery
Brew it
A starting-point recipe from the style and the ABV on the label — derived, not tasted, and the sheet says which is which.
The bench sheet →The hunt
We track beers, we don't sell them — no stock promises. These are the searches we'd run for this one.