Know what your breweries are pouring next — Hop Grail's register of US beer label approvals.

Multiflora label
Label · tap for full size
Double / Imperial IPA · label approved 12 October 2017
Label approval surrendered

Multiflora

Decadent AlesConnecticut
Tasted it? Journal it
  • 9.6% ABV
  • Cans
  • DDH
Hops
Hop, as printed on the label

Loading…

Decadent Ales' Double / Imperial IPA. Label approved 12 October 2017.

Brewed at OVERSHORES BREWING CO (Connecticut). More brewed there.

More from Decadent Ales

All 32 →

Similar beers

More IPA →
Start a four-pour flight with Multiflora →
  1. Label submitted26 September 2017
  2. Label approved12 October 2017
  3. SpottedNo sighting on file

Ask Hop Grail:

Everything from Decadent Ales is on their page.

Scan a can to find any beer like this one. Get the free iPhone app →

The Friday Pour — optional

New beers from the week, every Friday.

About this beer

This is the 2nd of 32 labels we have from Decadent Ales. It is one of 8 double / imperial ipa labels approved in October 2017. Its label was approved 16 days after it was submitted. The label names one hop, Mosaic, and carries ddh on the front. The brand on the label is Decadent Ales; it was brewed at OVERSHORES BREWING CO in Connecticut.

Where this comes from
TTB ID17269001000182
Serial177021
Label approved12 October 2017
Submitted26 September 2017
Name on the approvalOVERSHORES BREWING CO
StyleDouble / Imperial IPA
Class / type902 · Ale
Alcohol9.6%
VesselCans
HopsMosaic
FamilyIPA
ModifiersDDH
OriginConnecticut
SourceUS TTB label approval (COLA), not a shelf listing

Read from the label art by Hop Grail. Fields checked against the approved label. How we get this data

The brewery

Brand
Decadent Ales
Brewed at
OVERSHORES BREWING CO
Location
250 BRADLEY ST, EAST HAVEN, CT, 06512
Production
Brewed for the brand at another brewery

Brew it

The label names its hops — Mosaic — which is enough for a real starting point.

The bench sheet →

The hunt

We track beers, we don't sell them — no stock promises. These are the searches we'd run for this one.