Day of the Dead Lager — full label as filed with TTB
Label as filed · tap for full resolutionPLATE Nº 19266001000325 · cleared 7 October 2019
Lager (other/unspecified) · cleared 7 October 2019

Day of the Dead Lager

Reuben's BrewsWashington

A TTB label filing on the register, cleared 7 October 2019. TTB ID 19266001000325. This is the paperwork, not a shelf listing.

  1. Filedwith the TTB
  2. Cleared7 October 2019
  3. SpottedNot yet — watching

Register-wide, a cleared beer typically surfaces at its brewery within 15 days — four out of five inside 30 — measured across 181 filings we've watched land. This page gets stamped the moment it's seen.

No account neededWatch this filing

One email when the register first sees it on a shelf scan or the brewery's own board. Nothing else, and a stop link in it.

On your grail list. Check Friday for this house.
Tasted it? Journal it

Ask HopGrail:

Every Reuben's Brews filing lives on the house page.

Weekly Docket — optional

This filing went on record 7 October 2019, before the beer reached a shelf. Check Friday's register for this house. The docket is a second, optional dispatch.

In the register

This is the 2nd of 39 label filings we hold from Reuben's Brews. It is one of 82 lager (other/unspecified) labels approved in October 2019. It cleared 14 days after it was filed.

Certificate of Label Approval
TTB ID19266001000325
Serial190921
StyleLager (other/unspecified)
Class / type901 · Beer
Alcohol6%
VesselDraft
FamilyLager
OriginWashington
Cleared7 October 2019
ProvenanceUS TTB COLA — the filing itself, not a shelf listing

Extracted from label art by hopgrail · fields verified against the filing

The house

Brand
Reuben's Brews
Applicant
Reuben's Brews, Reuben's Brews LLC
Location
5010 14TH AVE NW, Seattle, WA, 98107
Production
Brewed in-house

Brew it

A starting-point recipe from the style and the filed ABV — derived, not tasted, and the sheet says which is which.

The bench sheet →

The hunt

We're the register, not the store — no stock promises. These are the searches we'd run for this one.